Nirvana standpoint Bodhisattva Nagarjuna.

Since the Buddha declared: "Sarvam Sunyam" (Things are not), from the suggestion of three French publications: "Impermanence-Suffering-No-self" and then the law is conceived as, "All impermanent, everything is selfless, "the issue of Nirvana (Nirvaia), after the Buddha's passing has been raised sectarian question back on the teenage their understanding of Nirvana , and since then every debate about it and other teachings parts become stiff. Nirvana, the problem exists or does not exist, there is (bhava) or not (abhava), a topic that raises born every debate, increasingly fierce between the so-called Friends of organic Circuit set sets (Sarvasti-vadin) and Business Economics called the amount of (Sutra-vadin), between Theravada and Mahayana no cardboard (sunyata-vadin), and this issue no longer stop here but also advances further, in mediating between the two points mentioned above by all together, then accept both to take an existing Nirvana under their reconciliation, or deny both are not there, such right; That is four minutes of the sectarian views, but according to Nagarjuna (Nagarjuna), the Buddha never said that a second such Nirvana, even when he was on earth, or after his death in Niet- table, he said:

     When Tathāgata exists,
     Not to say there are not the same,
     nor say yes-no,
     Or no, no no.

     And:

     After Tathagata kill,
     Not to say there are not the same,
     nor say yes-no,
     Or no, no no.

     For Bodhisattva Nagarjuna, then such notions of sectarianism for Nirvana is completely inaccurate, and do not understand the meaning of 'Sarvam Sunyam "so have such misconceptions about Nirvana meaning. From this misunderstanding should have deviated His middle path, and there is obvious distortions of the law in general and in particular Nirvana.Since the middle path of the Buddha or the Supreme Being not fall, do not fall into the moderate There has not, nor fall into neither have not not, of biased viewpoints tied accept this evil, which path China religion is the path of liberation of all the ties between the two shores of suffering.

     For Friends of Theravada, first they understand "All things are not" just for the only compounded also the unconditioned law as Nirvana, not being dependent on them, the second "All things are not "just for Nhon no, not for the French, the third" Everything is not "this is not empty, no nothing, no this is not in contrast to females. Therefore they have questioned thus:

     If all the measures are not,
     are not born, not destroyed;
     How have the clip-kill,
     order called Nirvana?

     Above is how receptive "All things are not" and accordingly the Theravada question is, if all the measures are not, no nothing, there is no phenomenon of birth and death, when no phenomenon being destroyed, any problem arises which followed it, they do not exist. So what piece, something that can kill called Nirvana? So they say, all's not legal, but the law must be true. Because of such measures must not, should it cut through all the negativity or industry, destroying warm years to bring to Nirvana. To answer this question for victims, Nagarjuna also their stance, reverse back to ask:
 

     If the law is there,
     unproductive time not kill;
     The What, killing place,
     which is called Nirvana?
 

     Since the Theravada not comprehend legal deepest spot No (Dharmasunyata), so has confusion, given that the legal approach is not emptiness, nothingness, no nothing; This is not legal measures against their back, so was born the wrong interpretations of the law, and thereby giving victims such issues. Also standpoint this is the mistake, he put back the problem that if the law was not not that is so, and because traditionally they are always present, they have always been there, they would not have birth no kill; So when was born not kill, how they have room to room to kill that piece called Nirvana? Here are two useful-countless doors (bhava-Abhava) is not the door to go to Nirvana, that Nirvana must be called:

     No, do not come,
     No paragraph, nor often;
     Not being, nor destroyed,
     It is called Nirvana.

     Here, everything is slavery, dependence, attachment dualistic prejudices such as prime-ventricular, to-go, segment-usually, birth-killing etc .. were negative. In the new negative watch out as bearing both properties recently built just smashed. But here, if it is identified as such, then immediately falls into the segment-usually (Ucchada-Nitya) immediately. Hence, all identified were also denied, so that opens up a wide path wander unfettered, that middle path to go to Nirvana. That is, after we carried out unscathed against the law, it is the road itself, by itself is not Nirvana, nor one another. Here, the operating-result is not the place to achieve, not a place to come, not a place to get rid of, there is no way to distinguish; not bear not destroy, so Nirvana is not there, nor did not, not grasping all measures, passed away inside called it Nirvana. Why ? Since all existing phenomena of things to our eyes see, always in a state of being defeated turn septic, just old age and death are impermanent Minister kill dominant should not Nirvana. If there is an eye Nirvana do we realize that there is Nirvana's also just general old age and death, that death is not the old Minister Minister Nirvana, Nirvana, so there was not called, because it shuns laozi minister.

     Moreover, if Nirvana is there (organic), then what has this, or Nirvana belong to the minister compounded. But the minister compounded, according to Buddha, we are always in a state of not really have turned away. Why ? Because they exist is due to the grace that up.Consequently, all existing measures among us does not have any public method called organic whole, whether that is commonly used pseudo-called unconditioned reason to learn it.Impermanent still not there, let alone the law is not visible, can not be achieved. Again, according to him:

     If Nirvana is,
     Why not call attachment;
     Radio-organic from non-compliance (the capital),
     which is the method call.

     If true nirvana is really so, why in the business, told Nirvana Buddha is not clinging (very life, health or Infinite Balance: nirupadhizewa)? Was not clinging to it whether it is legal whatever measures may not exist here. If there are existing measures do then there is not a place very life, because according to the Nirvana of life is priceless, so no measures are not grasping here. So Nirvana is not there.

     Victim assistance:
     If the property is not Nirvana, then wealth is Nirvana?

     He said:

     Organic is not Nirvana,
     Much less for Forever;
     Nirvana without Friends,
     Where will be Forever?

     Too clear as the verse above-Vo Huu told not from grasping that. So why here again put the issue back to the Supreme Nirvana is? Why ? Because thanks to that very useful. Without ownership, how can wealth be. If this had not said before, then this character is priceless. But Nirvana is not so, because there is no law there is not any, so wealth can not be created Nirvana.

     Again, try to put a wealth Nirvana is going. But here, we do not solve the problem of non-attachment is Nirvana as Buddha taught in business. If wealth is Nirvana, the Buddha did not say not grasping the economic Nirvana as taught. Why ? Since there is not any legal non-attachment called that nothing at all, so Nirvana can not be called wealth.

     More, 

     As the scriptures say,
     there paragraph, paragraph there;
     I knew it was Nirvana,
     No nor not.

     The Buddha taught, if the exception to both: Yes, and this is no Nirvana would exist. Why ?Because there are only three organic (three worlds) and no property was only for cessation triangle. If the exception both property-wealth obstacles, then know that Nirvana was not there (non-organic) nor not (non multitude), that's called Nirvana.

     Victim assistance:

     If property or wealth is not the Nirvana of the property now and worthless, Nirvana Is not?He said:
 

     For property-wealth, if said
     contract is Nirvana;
     Huu-wealth was liberated,
     it was not the right time.
 

     Above property-wealth were negative, but the problem still bring them put victims back problems. Here, again came forth a more absurd, that is the consolidation between the property-wealth to have a Nirvana according to their views. But according to him, if the case is both useful and worthless Nirvana, ie where both organic and mineral is liberated, this is just information for Nirvana and liberate it. And right itself, organic and mineral, in a self-contradictory clause that with themselves, so how communication with the second side. Why ?Because we own and contrasting wealth, how to present the same place at the same time being.Thus, where both organic and mineral Nibbana is not right. Again :

     For property-wealth, if said
     contract is Nirvana;
     Nirvana is where the mortgage,
     both from being approved.

      Above, we have not informed yourself already. If they are right back here where Nirvana is acceptable to go, provided that they are not self-contradictory; but here Nirvana itself is not a place of clinging, while property-wealth from birth cling place, with one another due to existence. Then both sides conflict and not to be interconnected, so that they are not Nirvana.

     Again, Nirvana is tasteless, it surpasses the multitude of organic-conditioned. While property-wealth that the city was united not escape compounded, which means they belong compounded. But legal compounded is being destroyed as the Buddha taught, while the unconditioned law is not legal birth and death. So how sure property-wealth is combined into Nirvana?

or,

      Organic two-plus the myriad
     How is Nirvana?
     These two are not the same place as the
     evening light as inappropriate.

     Above, the two having failed-not a problem. Here again is another matter again in the plus two concepts back to Nirvana exists, how we can do it. Why? Because they have no self-contradictory contrast, can not coexist a place. As light and darkness, unable to coexist simultaneously. When there exists, will not exist, whereas when there will not exist does not exist. So how have-not together together, but called Nirvana?

     Back victim assistance:

     If the Yes-No grouped together is not Nirvana, now neither have neither Nirvana is not it?

     He said:

     If there is no no, 
     call it Nirvana; 
     There is not no this, 
     no way to distinguish? END=NAM MO AMITABHA BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH GIAC TAM.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTENMENT.VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN AMITABHA PURELAND=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.6/11/2016.