Chapter VIII
Some people, like the followers of sects billion Andhakas and Uttapathakas sect advocated that the Asura (Asuras) into realms reborn meeting Friday. Related to this issue, Sakavadin raised the question, the opposite sect agree approval.
To oppose this point because in post Lecture Hair Down [2] mentioned in the realm reborn: 'O Sariputta (Sariputta), is in the realm ... "Sakavadin ask: "Is there in the realm?" Rival sects agree assent for fear must go against Buddhist texts on. Related to the issue, should Sakavadin disagree that there are six such planes.
Affordable, actually had a group of Asura (Asuras) escaped four misery? But this is not to form a separate realm. Why so? Because not find any existence separate realms at all. The Asura (Asuras) Kalakanjaka be understood as belonging to the group of converted (peta). And a group of Asura (Asuras) Other - ie Vepaciti group - to be regarded as belonging to the group of Devas.Therefore do not think that there exists a separate realm at all (Friday realms).
Now to illustrate the meaning of this question, "Is the group Asura Kalakanjaka (again without any separate realms for them)?" etc .. are starting to raise. If so, "the same shape" should be understood as the appearance they are always the same. "It's disgusting," should understand that ugly, awful. "The pleasures of the same" means that they are enjoying the sensual pleasures alike."Along with similar nutrients" means water flowing nose, blood in the wound, etc .. are the same at all. "There are the same length life" means their maximum lifespan similar to each other. They perform the same marriage group (relative to each other) means that girls can marry her divorces and even held a decent wedding. "Similarities in" shape outer beauty ", which means there is beautiful appearance, easy to see, lovely and attractive." It tastes the same "means that they are generally five types of sexual pleasures senses the same box. "the same both in the diet." means that they use the same food etc .. the rest is the same as explained above.
"Does not exist a group of Asura (Asuras) are there?" - This is mentioned to show a group of Asura (Asuras) already exists. But because there is not a realm reserved for this group, the possible fate has been established.
Rate debate discuss diverse destiny ends here.
II. Rate Debate: Current status of renewable intermediate (intermediate) ( antorabhava: Middle organic).
[106] As explained careless Buddhist texts follows - " perfect entity exists in the moment (space and time) [3] - some people, like cult Pubbaseliyas billion and Sammitiyas, undertakings concerned view that "there exist transitional moment in which the property may be biased, but incomplete, or false being that potential [4] often, but not strong enough, to be patient waiting for re reincarnated on their parents for a period of less than a few weeks. Related to this issue Sakavadin ask: "Was there this incident happened or what?" etc .. Gender opposite agreed to endorse, because the views were consistent with the policy.
Then to try to convince (the opposite sex) with a statement of the Buddha, said to be only three realms reborn (bhava) only, Sakavadin questioned: "Education property [5] there exist?" etc .. Here we should understand the meaning as follows: Suppose there is a status quo is considered intermediate status quo reborn thus definitively must exist "in the way of rebirth (bhava)" etc .. Education is regarded as useful. etc .. Please let me ask you (the opposite sex) a question: "Did you have determined that the status quo is the Education intermediary organic, or organic Sac [6], or the author's lifetime arūpa? "opposite sect rejects all these events. As opposed sects exists not accept any such events.
In the interpretation "... Education of any public property ..." etc .. happened to to persuade rival sects that exist supposing such a Central property. This event is apt to happen the reborn state.Like some time divided between two moments there. Certain sects opposed not accept such things, should have dismissed the entire issue. Such opposing sect rejects "reality" by Sakavadin undertakings, simply because of the views (opposite sex) guidelines, but has little to do with the teachings at all.
Because (the current state of rebirth transition) does not include the current state of existence has been confirmed above, in the interpretation "that twenty-five existing method" was launched to persuade rival sects, supposedly exist to make something better than the current situation mentioned above, (opposite sex) has agreed to approve. In the interpretive question: "Is it now does not lead to this situation?" This is the question posed to persuade rival sects. Supposing there really exists a status quo exists as such, must have an industry that led to the current status, as has now led to life. As Bhagavan (TL. Buddha) has pointed out, after he had analyzed these points. But in the opinion of the opposite sex, do not exist any obvious now and because they both undertakings and that man was born in a transitional status quo that existed, now led entirely through that person must be born where many different realms, thus opposing sect denied that: "there is no such current situation at all."
When asked: "Are we born, reborn middle realm exists?" [107] opposite sect rejected because, according to the class of beings opposite sex that refers to those who have reached World and Education Lust. Similarly, when asked: "Are we born to be reborn the same?" etc .. opposite sect rejected, because the opposite sex does not accept the current state of birth, old age and death that appears where the status quo, or destroy the status quo and renewed birth.
When asked, "Is it the physical characteristics of beings were created so affordable ?. etc .." (opposite sex) again rejected, because (the opposite sex) that when beings were approaching an intermediate status quo so then being no longer any properties at all, and the physical characteristics of living beings such as feelings and things like that were not as crude as many other beings. And it is for this reason the (opposite sex) related dismissed "in the way of being" should be understood in this sense.
Now concerning the process of being able to exist as in the question: "Are Sexual Gender is not destiny?" etc .. In this case should be understood as follows: Suppose you have existing on the current status of China so useful it is fate, because in fact already exists a classification reborn so forth. . in Education gender, etc .. Or, if there exists such a classification can not survive a transition fate like that. In such cases, the nuances of being one way or another, all the same, with the classification of each being there, but not where China friendship, here are the reasons for this difference? However, the opposite sex, because the policy has its own point of view, should one place to another (opposite sex) agree agree then rejected.
When asked: "Is it still exists transitional status quo that existed where any living being reasonable?" opposite sect rejected because (sect opposing) did not accept any of the current state of Sino beings possession to advance to be, or hell, or mindless realm or even more formless realms. Because of this (the opposite sex) agree with the opposite approach.
In the interpretation, "because there is an intermediary state (or transition)," Foreign etc .. is mentioned to show that living beings, after distinguish the status quo, because they have traditionally opposed not accept a status quo reborn intermediate (or transition) so. All these issues should be interpreted according to what was written in the scriptures along with the proof in the Buddhist scriptures.
Rate the current state of debate on the intermediate (or transition) ends here.
In this case according to the policy Sakavadin perspective, "Education ( kāma )" can be replaced with "the object of the senses," "pollution worldly things" and "the realm of Education (Kamabhava )". "The first word" lust "means being pleasure, lust; elements (aggregates) [108] here are hungry for meaning, or simply" hunger "only. But in words finally Kama means "Feelings" or "where the object is to appear senses." "pollution (aggregates)" here always be interpreted as absolute exists. not a single entity in particular, does not exist. [8]
But by the words of the Buddha: "O you monks, there are five kinds of sense-pleasures" [9] The view of the opposite sex is "Education World ( kāma )" means that only five types of sense-pleasures view only.
Thus, to explain to those under the current Pabbaseliyas sect, there are many types of undertakings "Education" senses. Sakavadin has raised the question: "There are only five categories, or what?" For such undertakings should rival sects agree approval. "Is not that so?"etc .. has been said up to prove the contamination and worldly desires. In that case, "tied with" means to be pooled with the sensory pleasures such as objects. In interpreting the "Can not say (where planes karma) exists only five (sense-pleasures), five sense-pleasures is called karma realms, has a tendency to desire [10] exists there . etc .. tied to it, "education" includes the "education later section (ie lust) is understood as the pollution etc .. ... are craving desire."Education" also means "desire + components (aggregates) are known as desire." In the "mundane eye" etc .. is mentioned to show that shows the object of desire. In that case the opposite sex do not reject the agency six senses as objects of desire coexist with life karma, but again, when asked again: "Or as intellectual stars?" Opposite sect job thinking is profound supernatural wisdom, and to agree that life, not coexist with now. But because wisdom exists in all realms mentioned above to coexist with now, so Sakavadin dismissed opposite sex by making this Buddhist texts.
"The sense-pleasures" etc .. is mentioned here to show areas of human life now. But because this area often not thought to be only the feeling, senses it's all human realm, so the opposite sect denied: "not so."
"Actions have now led to it?" and the whole thing remaining to be asked to prove that only the feelings of lust senses does not mean that human life only included elements (aggregates) now only. Also led to the human realm now called elements (aggregates) now, and also beings approached the plane that now. [109] Those who are to be born, grow up, grow old, and die, to disappear, to be reborn in that realm. But not where the pleasure of feeling the (pure).
Rate debate on the senses feel pleasure ends here.
Since only the word Buddha said: " Do you, O monks, there are five things feel pleasure to create sensual senses " [11] Some people, such as sex ratio Phubbaseliyas advocated that the five types of sense objects, just as tangible objects, etc .. constitute sensory desires. To prove just the "what pollution" that has really created a sensual, Sakavadin ask: "Only five (object) nothing?"rival sects agree approval.
Meaning the rest were too well.
Rate debate on the senses lust ends here.
Some people, such as sex ratio Andhakas held that, elements (aggregates) Lust, Caution (element) consists of absolute physical characteristics alone. Concerning this point Sakadavin ask: "Is it only physical characteristics all?" Rival sects agree assent, because the entire material including the human realm, and the realm of Lust. Therefore, to persuade rival sects on that basis Sakavadin ask: "Is just realms Sac resident legal or not?" etc .. all the problems as has been explained in the points table debate on "the pleasure of feeling the" [12]
When asked again: "Is it now also concurred with Lust?" Rival sects agree assent, because (the opposite sex) as it goes against the three conditions have been accepted under the human realm. When finished, the opposite sect rejected because it was right in view of the (opposite sex). But obviously really was so. We can reach the two realms exist simultaneously? Therefore Sakavadin opposite sect asked further: Or did the same with human life? "Etc .. rival sects rejected, because we can not reach the two realms exist simultaneously.
Rate debate about elements (aggregates) Lust, Caution end here.
Here we should understand the meaning by the same method mentioned above.
However, related to intangible objects, we get some instruction by considering some intangible concept such. - "Feeling" - and we questioned the view that the concept of human life or not, etc .. Here [110] we should understand the meaning as follows: Is it feeling etc .. are regarded as intangible items, including affordable feelings of (human life) sphere of life or not?
Article rest should be understood as already explained above.
Rate debate about elements (aggregates) arūpa ends here.
Assessment according to Buddhist scriptures following paragraph: - Do insight morphogenesis Lust, Caution, along with all of the major elements as well as complete accessories, not missing any public authority. [14] - some people, billion as sects and Sammitiyas Andhakas visualization for the groups of Brahma Realm as well as some of the rest has been olfactory (taste sensations), taste (taste sensations), and touch. They also, who are present, in the realms of Lust, Caution still have six Origin ( khandha, ayatana ) as normal humans. Concerning these issues Sakavadin questioned: "Was the whole people (of the realm Pham Thien), all six Origin (khandha, ayatana ) like me?" Rival sects agree agreed, because rival sect advocated that view.
Then, against the opinion of the opposite sect, related to sensory organs are not in this area. "Are olfactory (billions of origin) may exist in the realm (Sanskrit God) that reasonable?" etc .. get started.Rival sects agree approval for under (opposite sex), smell etc .. is tangible objects and objects of spiritual smell. When asked more about the audience taste. etc .. the opposite sex does not accept the corresponding object within the olfactory bulb and the remaining senses. Therefore rival sects rejected, and refused to accept these areas.
By this method, one should understand the meaning according to the methods mentioned above, both on the field and reverse lookup of the problems related to.
"Is it reasonable olfactory exist?" Does smell, still exist? Does history have recognized the smell sensory reasonable? "These questions, which have been raised, because it is related to some Goddamn have opposite views. We are told, those in the realm of Brahma, also full six senses as we have senses and each individual task. "They also said the smell, etc .. can smell, taste, see and touch is the olfactory senses. etc .. related to sects opposed to this view endorsed agrees: "Yes, yes," but when asked again: "But the taste, smell exists?" etc .. because they can not prove that smells, tastes like existence, opposing sects immediately rejected.
Rate debate on the senses where rūpa realm here is the end.
That is why Buddha said: " Because where there is awareness, instant-matter appear [15] Some people, such as sex ratio Andhakas held that, even in the realm arūpa, also still matter in the form of exquisite, pure. physically separate from the primitive. " Related to this issue Sakavadin ask: "Is there material (Formless realm or not?" Etc .. rival sects agree approval.
What remains clear.
Rate matter where debate Formless realms to this is the end.
Some people, such as sex ratio and Sammitiyas Mahimsakas said that the physical behavior and speech, "according to the original meaning is also the material qualities, is considered to be a listed physical and speech. The essence is good if consider ethical perspective and the perspective of the bad bad terms. [16] In relation to these Sakavadin asks: "If the process takes from the city center, then good is not it good?" etc .. Mission for against agree approval.
Then, "Are there spiritual objects in there?" etc .. are surveyed to persuade rival sects as follows: If it comes from the moral consciousness, there must be a spiritual object in it and include spiritual attributes; Superb action raw whole spiritual characteristics or not? Opposite sect denies.In this case, "anticipate" and "target" means the equivalent of desire. [17] Action before, is so called, because it refers to efforts [18] of good ideas; while the second act, be considered as sustained effort. But on the other hand, in sensations, perceptions and desires, beliefs and rest, is done by the mind from sensations and good rest, efforts aimed at predicting and have achieved, not not come from desire. Why so? Need to understand is one of two types of desire [112] did not appear, and other desirable that hearing has become too familiar. In the expression: "the visible realm" and the other thing, first, "Is it possible that the whole thing is already in the perspective of ethical consideration" be questioned to prove to detail briefly .
In the way that the remaining applications "voice data comes from immoral it?" etc ... with all the additional things later, so understood in the texts. Here "dirty material" means the semen.
It Buddhist texts used to prove of course very clear meaning.
Rate materially debate as ethical behavior is ended here.
"Some people, such as sex ratio and Sammitiyas Pubbaseliyas said that because the right network is an invisible event is different from the mind, [20] thus the network is not the right material. [21] In relation to the issue this raises the question Sakavadin, and opposing sects agree approval.
As for the question: "Is not there any such thing as" a private life where the material? 'Adaptation opposite dismissed, because the opposite sect recognized physical phenomenon, it is the accomplishments, and what remains is like (for example) the vines, etc .. in terms of fuel continuity still ways to continue developing, vibrant, existence, maintenance, forward and be kept protected. that is why, the opposite sect agree agree with the question: is there something? " etc ..
For questions: "There exists no formless life?" Rival sects agree assent, because (opponents) to accept that energy remains constant, separated from consciousness where formless phenomena.
For the question, "Does my life, a physical phenomenon consistent with the metaphysical vitality reasonable?" Rival sects agree assent, because (the opposite sex) to accept that where material remains the spiritual conditions, material characteristics or properties also bring spiritual, and all of the conditions this makes life separate from consciousness.
For issues related to "Someone fell into a coma estate, why? [22] In relation to life when entering meditation, why? Phai opposition has rejected the recently approved consent . Sakavadin [113] does not agree to accept the case, said: "If such" etc .. to be convinced that, if life does not exist in an invisible manner and repeatedly, then (the nonexistent in) that is characteristic of life physically alone.
For problems related to the collection of aggregates List, [23] the opposite sect rejected regarding contact and section aggregates remaining set list, while (the opposite sex) agreed to endorse the relevant to now (action), and gathering physical rest. Opposite sect advocated that suggests that where the body, right speech and right action is also energy only. All these combined factors of which the collection of aggregates. But without such acceptance, Sakavadin ask: "Gather sensations exist?" etc .. to be convinced that such fake set of aggregates were involved in work stoppages features first formless and the vitality open places, then only four sets only. Opposite sect rejected in case fell into semi-consciousness, but they agree in the case endorsed by coma [24] then it would usually be regained. This is the method applicable to partial problems related to being unconscious.
In view of the opposite sex, even being born in the realm of mindless, lost consciousness. Along with that consciousness appears to some kind of invisible force not related to the mind emerges and exists throughout countless lifetimes idea. Therefore, after the opposite sex asks: "Does not exist a kind of comments like that?" for the vitality of beings, the opposite sect not recognized.When asked again: "Is there exists a reasonable sense of that type?" (Opposite sex) to agree to endorse.
(Delegation of the opposition) also rejected because the collection by spiritual feelings and what remains. has occurred. (Delegation opposed) agree agree Removal and students were too clear where all beings. Because not accept this view, Sakavadin immediately raised the issue, asking: "How in the existing methods do exist or not?" etc .. to persuade rival sects at this point is that, if in this case at the same time still have feelings, etc .. Then ultimately means that in existing methods still exist. Opposite sect rejected for fear of going against the Buddhist scriptures. As for the question: "Is it aware that split into a no?" (Opposite sex) agreed to endorse because (the opposite sex) objects associated undertakings could be separated out. Meanwhile differentiating characteristics (definitely) still exist.
"Are there two networks right?" Opposing sect to ask questions and Sakavadin agree approval.Since we heard of this was as follows: Network consists of two types of rights: the right network identity and network rights list. Thus beings maintain vitality both at the same time and this energy when the two separated at death. " [25] at the moment," death "of this right will kill two networks.
Rate vitality debate ends here.
Some people, such as sex ratio and Sammitiyas Pubbaseliyas advocated that an Arhat of past life was slandering had reached an A-ha-drought levels, probably because in a previous life that now makes you a -la-drought which have left the Arhat level. Concerning these issues, Sakavadin ask questions: "Is it because now (his behavior)?" etc .. Gender opposite agree approval. What remains the same as explained in point arguing about escapism (left) level Arhat.[26]
In the interpretation, "Then, an Arhat again slander many Arhat, why?" Sakavadin ask questions to make (the opposite sex) to accept predestined by now that an Arhat may be left level Arhat (ie fall). Then to make the opposite sex agree endorse that claim. Sakavadin asked: "Everyone is doing the same?" etc .. to convince (the opposite sex) that: if so. all those who slander the Arhat're also accomplishing the Arhat level affordable. Because not realize any warranties (niyama) in reaching any level Arhat is so so now brings, opposite sect has denied. [27]
Score operational debate is also a predestined end here.
By the end of chapter VIII here also.
-ooOoo-
Chapter IX
[115] This is Sakavadin doctrine on this point: He assured that anyone who once received clearly (a) the "world (compounded)" (literally "the compounded material") is the place full of danger, and (b) Nip-table is the ultimate realm, they will get rid of all the "shackles" ( fetters : Repeated yoke) binding. But some people, namely Andhakas sects accept only one of the two statements above only. and that only the second new awareness to prevent [29] are all hindrances yoke. Related to this issue Sakavadin questioned, while rival sects agree approval.
To map out the opposite sex found by differentiating the views of (sect opposed) is superficial and "worldly things" is also considered a great threat, Sakavadin said: "Once these objects conditioned [30] , ( samkhāra ) "etc .. (to be regarded as a great threat). Meaning that question be interpreted as follows: "Should not we be able to admire both of which not only is impermanent? And realized realms Nip-table is being real or not?" Because sect opposed to that, anyone who once considered the realm Níp being true, he will immediately be removed every yoke grip.Therefore the issue is set for the opposite sex is: "Are we going to remove the whole" shackles "when we consider the" compounded objects "just as impermanent and not others?" (opposite sex) agree agree: "Well yes," So we can contemplate impermanence where the "compounded object" while enjoying the realm Níp always being true: - You co such attention is not? Then the opposite sect rejected because one can only be a matter of thinking a moment alone. When asked again, (opposite sex) agreed to endorse it because it's moments too fast. However when the sect denies opposing reasons, Sakavadin asked: "Do you accept people we can eliminate all the" shackles "when we contemplate the impermanence of all things just, and identify promising realms at the same time being true or not. But is has two center, two thoughts occur simultaneously or what? " and therefore (Sakavadin) were dismissed. This method is also applicable in the question: "As such Noble Truth." Etc ..
But what's the conclusion? Are we just should mull impermanence etc .. or just aware Nip-table is being true realm alone, [116] or that one can simultaneously recognize both the problem to remove the entire "shackles" or what? If it happened to anyone considered all things are impermanent, etc. .. thanks aware that meditation can also occur. Or, if it happened to anyone identify this great benefit, just as well as by conscious meditation so we again distinguish Nip-table chatter is rumors or stars. Or, if someone recognize both problems at once, definitely two reactions must occur at the same time spiritual, etc .. We should understand that when someone is entering the threshold of Qingdao , then understanding impermanence etc .. and by the end because he was convinced of impermanence, etc .. should such a person be removed everything. Also, while aware Nip-table, he or she desires tremendous happiness in it, away all shackles would be removed, and while completing only enter meditation all things are impermanent and so on. . he will be aware Nip-table is immense realm to give public welfare ..
And the Buddhist scriptures, namely, "is contemplating happiness where Nip-table [31] ." Clarified awareness events, sense, etc .. great happiness where Nip-table. But it was not aware of such great happiness to shake off the shackles entire anywhere. Therefore apparently unsettled issues.
Rate joint debate on the (liberated thanks admire) the good ends here.
[117] Because address a careless Buddhist texts back - " He only imagine what goes on Nip-table." [33] etc .. some people, namely those belonging to sect Pubbaseliyas for immortality is subject to reflection and also a "yoke" ( fetters ). Concerning them Sakavadin questioned, and rival sects agree approval.
And to convince (the opposite sex) understands that, as the immortal author is the subject of reflection, to become the "shackles", the immortal will be "shackled" or star grip "etc .. Sakavadin asking asked: "is it immortal (because the audience thought) was" shackled "to be reasonable?etc .. Delegation opposed reject all these issues for fear of having the opposite of the Buddhist scriptures. Thus, one should understand the meaning as set forth above in anywhere. In the Buddhist scriptures, namely, " one realizes Nip-you so ," [34] as quoted above, here Nip-table is simply a state or object (of the mind), the main so this has not been clearly demonstrated.
Rate debate about "eternal" is the object reflection ends here.
Some people, particularly those of Mahayana (Uttarapathakas) for that identity can know objects (sarammana), not because of the purely physical sense object itself becomes spiritual, but because the main manifestations of material exposing the spiritual. and because they can not distinguish objects reflection (ārammana) and causal relationship (paccaya). Related to this issue, to clarify the concept known as spiritual objects, Sakavadin raised the question. and opposing sects agree approval. Here what the rest should be understood in the sense stated in the Buddhist scriptures.
With questions. "Is it wrong to say that," agreed to endorse Sakavadin associated "exposure" is only one object only. As for the second question, too star. When he (Sakavadin) agrees agrees that "object" is only one of the causal relationship. [35] Thus, we have proved to be excellent, in addition to its correlation characteristics, while anonymous said the object again.
Rate debate about "material" is the subject of spiritual ends here.
Some people, particularly those belonging to denominations and some belonging Andhakas Mahayana (Uttarapathakas) advocated that "the so-called" ø (seven) Custom Hypnosis ( anusaya) [36] What is the phenomenon separate from spirituality, unconditioned, infinite, so no object[37] spiritual happening simultaneously. Concerning them Sakavadin ask questions about which newspapers Options, and rival sects agree to endorse.
Then to try to persuade the audience that the underlying trends that have been deemed not to be in such physical characteristics, Sakavadin asked: Does the form of (a tendency that) no material characteristics? " etc .. In paragraph interpret "reasonable senses lust?" etc .. we see that lust is not separate from the underlying tendencies that. also with the question, "is it a collection of concomitants no spiritual objects? "Phai opposition dismissed as related to the same set of events occurred with wisdom, but they agreed to approve related to underlying trends, energy, the acts of physical morphology. and what are pooled where consciousness. as such, should be interpreted as meaning that in any situation.
But to the question: "That has happened with latent tendencies or not?" - It does not eliminate the tendencies that were described as "likely potential". rather than "likely shown where underlying trends." What is not considered is the past nor the present or future. This is the craving to be demolished to joining Holy Way. This is said to be present, because they have not been removed.Similarly, we do not believe that, this and that is the object of material characteristics. Therefore, not only in this matter, [118] but also in cases of sexual practices etc .. affinity is also in the latent tendencies again, this was rejected. Thus the non-object where the "underlying trends" in fact has yet to be proven.
Rate debate tendencies (unethical) no object underlying spiritual ends here.
Some people, particularly those who follow Andhakas sect holds that, precisely because one of Arhat, it is endowed with a sense of vision, we can say that you are endowed with the top spot and location this restaurant at the time did not have the object, that's why there was no known location scenes. Related to these people, Sakavadin raised the question, is the opposite of that sect agree that such approval.
The remaining things here should be understood as explained in point table debate on the underlying trends. [38]
Rate debate object of meditation without spiritual ends here.
Some people, particularly as the followers of Mahayana (Uttarapathakas) said that, since the object of spiritual past and future do not really exist. So the intellectual audiences recall past lives (past) wisdom ie no object. Nothing is known as the spiritual objects. The object's spiritual past. Related to these people, Sakavadin question: Is the object exists a spiritual past? Rival sects agree such endorsements is correct.
What remains to be understood in the Buddhist scriptures.
Rate debate about past views ends here.
Here the spiritual application first (and areas of operation of this application) can occur in two ways: by treating consciousness as objects and by collecting back (the same happened as a place where consciousness is active). In the absence of the rule by which we can assume that this and that is the sense of no application object initially. [119] We can say, the spiritual condition initial applications fall into full consciousness. But because of some sense to vanish without any dependence on the initial application yet, this does not fall into (ie operations) any sense at all.[39] Some people, namely those of Mahayana (Uttarapathakas) does not recognize this difference and holds that the initial application of this spiritual happening just indiscriminately where all consciousness. Concerning them Sakavadin questioned, and rival sects rejected.
What remains to be understood in the text written in the Buddhist scriptures.
Rate debate early spiritual application ends here.
Because we believe that "thoughtfully and discrete applications generated voice." [40] Some people, namely Pubbasebiyas sect that sound can take place even if the ongoing awareness without sense to collaborate, because sound reinforcement only at "vibration (or shine) in the application of wisdom [41] early and prolonged. Concerning Sakavadin ask:" no longer what again? "on this issue agree sect opposed approval.
Then the explanation to begin with, "Are only sound comes from the spiritual contact or what?"Sakavadin not say this to persuade rival sects said that if the noise was nothing but the transmission of applications and spiritual beginnings prolonged exposure is spreading its spiritual etc .. also can spread out its characteristic sound. Opposite sect rejected because (opposing sects) not found in Buddhist scriptures that assumption. In the interpretive question "Is the sound is the spiritual spread initial application and hearing lasted realized or what?" should also be asked to add: "Is it sounds just how pervasive application of spiritual development or what?"
According to those who do not learn from the Buddhist scriptures carefully, the sound is not generated by the pervasive applications where spirituality; thus opposing sects rejected. This is just to show the perspective of (sect opposed) to the question: "Was not so sound and sense of hearing is the pervasive spiritual or what?" has been raised. Opposite sect advocated that sound just a pervasive application of purely spiritual sense, not hearing only. But according to the Buddha: " When I heard noises. The app spread wisdom is revealed." [42] the other (ie Sakavadin) shows also proved all elements of the auditory sense anymore.
Rate debate sounds like just purely spiritual phenomenon ends here.
"Because everybody can think of one hand and said one anchor, therefore we see no harmony, no mismatch between words and thoughts. The words can be conducted regardless of whether [ 112] does not need to think. This is the view of some people - particularly those who follow Pubbaseliyas sect. [43] "related to sound as imparting the initial application and spirituality long.Concerning these people Sakavadin questioned, and rival sects agree to endorse.
To try to persuade rival sects as follows: Without thinking generated voices, they also have no contact at that time etc .. Verse interpretation "Does not fit the voice contact or stars ? etc .. verse interpretation "Does not fit the voice exposed?" etc ... that is the question to be put out. Because of the interpretation "and what people do not want to speak out, why ? "etc .. In fact they say different things with what people are thinking, desire imply that people would say, therefore opposing sects rejected:" not so. "
In the interpretive question "Does no one can say civaram (ie robes) but said that ciram [44] (ie barking dogs). In that case the" wisdom mean to imply "completely wisdom is different from talking. so the latter case, completely different from the previous case is said to be thinking not match his words. that is why there is nothing deplorable say it all. " However, it can be that person did not intend to say the word "dog barking." By demonstrating such a significant and based on the voice is inconsistent with the idea, is the view of the opposite sex for the words do not fit in with the ideology. Such ideas come proven voice.
Rate debate, not specific words to fit in with the thought this is the end.
"For anyone, when to go in a certain direction, can also go in the other direction, so some people, namely those who follow that action Pubbaseliyas sect did not eat in, or inappropriate ideology, or false is not the result of thought " [45] that out. Action can be carried out without thought. Related to these people, Sakavadin raised the question, and opposing sects agree approval.
What is left should be understood as explained above (No. IX).
Rate particular argument does not fit in with the action of thought ends here.
On this point the concept of "attainment" should be split into two distinct concepts. [121] The first concept related to the present moment. But for someone who has achieved meditation Eight Jhana [46] , which may be present this experience. Some experiences have been in the past and others will get in the future, and some are going to be in my present proceeding, the whole experience can only be practiced by persistence alone. But some people do not accept this analysis, namely the followers of sects Andhakas advocate, because there are people who have reached the meditation Jhana 's in the past and the future, because they [47] have been able to meditation jhana about the past and the future right now, and right now, in relation to these people Sakavadin questioned, and rival sects agree to endorse.
In interpreting the "ecstatic than eight (stage) liberation" etc .. However, it proved they had been elected prime (eight meditation) rather than actually attained even at this time.
Rate debate on past experience and future really is now a prime player and now ends at the wire.
By the end of chapter IX here also.
-ooOoo-
Chapter X
[122] "Some people, particularly those who belong to that sect Andhakas if before a period of rebirth Center [48] is over, a period of consciousness (kiriya) [49] brings merit or irregularities together with the four aggregates and aggregates of matter arising from it, did not appear, then the period of rebirth come to an end. shall reign severed save lives. " Concerning the person class. Sakavadin ask: "Does it take place or not?" Rival sects agree such endorsements.
In the interpretation: "If that has emerged." a small number of locations have been used in the sense of how much the position. Here we understand as follows: Before the five aggregates are seeking rebirth ends, affordable five aggregates have emerged? Interpretive question mentions the number "ten (aggregates)" because if the aggregates that have emerged, which occurs at a pile (block) of many (five) khandha () and (five) aggregates still being activities (kiriya).
In the first question, the opposite sect rejected solely related to the five aggregates are the personal characteristics that. As for the second question, the opposite sect agree agree because if the five aggregates emerged as the (five) aggregates the past and the future, we can become more active aggregates. But when asked again involving two exposed and the current state of consciousness pooled, opposite sect rejected for not resorting to Buddhist scriptures.
In the interpretation "only four active aggregates," four aggregates that, good or bad, must be considered, unless the aggregate of form. In interpreting the "active wisdom" to understand the wisdom opposite sex no spiritual object is assigned to an Arhat when the visual sense is active[50] .
Opposite sect special question "When skandha ends, Qingdao has not appeared?" Sakavadin consent agreement, because they have not ended, Qingdao does not appear.
Sect opposed dialectical use raises the question as follows: "A person is dead Sacred Path has developed or not?" [123] But because wisdom those who still cling to the (cleaving) body, they still (alive) from the moment of rebirth until destroyed (dead). Sakavadin denied: "It's really not like that."
Rate eschatological debate end here.
Some people, particularly those belonging to sect Mahimsasakas, Sammitiyas and that three factors Mahasanghikas Sacred Paths - the language, the main industrial and menh- are nuances matter. [51] In relation to these people Sakavadin ask: "is the physical structure of the path of cultivation there is gross or not?" rival sects agree approval.
"There are objects which are not spiritual?" vv.la questions to persuade sect opposed to is if the three elements, the language, and chiunh chiunh menh- now no shortage of material factors, other factors, the year of the Holy Way - also is material of both. In this regard, and rejected the affirmation of the opposite sex should be understood as a personal opinion (opposite sex).
Article rest here was obvious.
Rate argue that physical forms (of any religion who are cultivating St.) also included the Holy Way in which ends here.
III . Rate Debate: Tue Chiang Dao (Way-Culture) of people are going to be contingent (fivefold sense-congition).
Some people, particularly those who follow Mahasanghikas sect, Buddhist texts involved: " As those who saw an object with your own eyes, that still does not comprehend in thought." [52]They for that we can demonstrate the Holy Way while still enjoying the Five Apartment (fivefold sense-congition). Concerning these people Sakavadin questioned, and rival sects agree to endorse.
If such a person represents the Holy Way, or Sacred Path is to cultivate nature of personnel (fivefold sense-congition), or of the person responsible senses to nature where Sacred Path. For sensory perception is only worldly in nature only, and do not take the Nip-table where objects.Therefore this nature can not include other things. So to try to persuade rival sects to ask, "Are there five categories Align and position objects already sprung up or not?" etc ..
Here we should understand that: If anybody is shown the Holy Path when there are five cognitive senses, decisively that person must also be conscious expression (ie mind) are more relevant Sacred Path to (mind) this. This must be so, you must accept that ABC's five categories (sense-consciousness) to have a position and an object such as has emerged [124] etc .. and we can predict that the Holy Path . If you do not that's true, then we must recognize "Luc Basing it. But if you do not that's true, you say to personnel. Therefore, we should not give the Sacred Path can be shown while it has been five Based (fivefold sense-congition). because this is what is meant to be understood concerning this issue, so Saksvadin, after having convinced the opposite sex characteristics of this Sacred Path, said that: "Therefore we can not assume that a person can express Sacred Path is when there are personnel (fivefold sense-congition)"
Still another method. If Noble related intimately with five senses consciousness has emerged a position, the (Sacred Way) no object. Or, if the Holy Path closely related to them (five kinds of sensory perception) have an object, then we can not say that with any noble object. Or, if the Holy Paths related to them have sanvi previous stance. the path which no object. Or, if the Noble related to what is regarded as the object precedes, the path that has no material objects do stand before it. Or, if the Holy religion relates to the object as the subject position. it is no object. Or, if the Noble Eightfold related objects also subjects where external objects, similar physical characteristics, etc .. then the path taken Nip-table as an object. Or, if Noble was associated with objects that have not been unbent position when taking action, then the path that has no object.Or, if the Holy Path concerned with objects objects not emerged, when active, the path it took Nip-table as an object. Or, if the Noble related to the status of objects of different types, then the path that no objects or only one. Or, if the Holy Paths related to the material realm can not get adequate scope or together, the path that can not get the sphere and scope that makes the objects outside. etc .. Or, if Scripture concerning religion but animals will pass without operating the application or attention by promoting intellectual with external objects. Or, if the Noble Eightfold related to things not in any chronological order, even so noble that the order did not get any time in which, as the past and the future, because they can emerged even at a time when most meditative flair. They do not emerge, and even places where no invisible target to appear.Or, if the Sacred Paths related to the physical [125] not have been self consecutive interesting, because there is no gap through accepting v, v ... the path that has no gaps. Or, if the path-related objects "left out of the natural demise. (Falling into an existing object) was not even certain similarities. Its job is to remove leave immoral actions.
Since this is significant, therefore Sakavadin thanks to this method, after having convinced the opposite sex for Noble is not in the nature of personnel (fivefold sense-congition), said: "Therefore, can not say that we can demonstrate the path is when there are personnel (fivefold sense-congition). "
In interpreting the "Related to empty: this supernatural beings have an interest in Nip-table is then, in the general sense this is only of interest to a wide range of spiritual factors. [53] "Is the visual sense will pass away like that?" for it is the Blessed One said, "because the eye and visible object (outlined emerging visual sense)" opposite sex doctor away. when asked again, (opposite sex) agreed to endorse the related notion that the words of the Buddha by the judge. " He who does not understand that in the thought, " it is very General, this is empty.
This is also the method in both questions: "Is it because of eye ....?" etc ..
In the question: "Are emerging visual awareness concerning the past and future?" this is the meaning: we can express the Holy Path is when there is awareness and perceptions manifest expression resurfaced as related to the past and the future. Does the visual sense is the same?This is also the method "related to spiritual contact" etc ..
In the interpretation, "When he saw an object with the eyes, he can not understand the general characteristics of the object." [54] We do not say that to understand the most common features (of an object is when there is an assessment or visual sense. that's why this has not been shown to be related to how the earth so.
Rate debate about Visualize Path (Way-Culture) of people are going to be contingent (fivefold sense-congition) ends here.
"Derived from the word of Buddha that" when a person reaches forward in virtue, he was endowed with wisdom, [55] some people, namely those who follow the guidelines for schools Mahasanghikas that, as a man of good heart are cultivating the mind Sacred Path does not belong to the secular realm. With the secular moral nature, now express this Sacred Path, he must have been both secular moral nature and the supernatural morality [56] (lofty) simultaneously. Concerning those who rank Sakavadin ask: "Is (it is a) who obtained the Noble Eightfold player ...?" [57] Delegation of the opposition agreed to approve.
Then to try to convince rival sects said that if a person can simultaneously be both secular moral nature and the supernatural, that person must contact the bipolar nature. etc .. Sakavadin asks: "With the bipolar nature exposed like that?" etc .. Delegation opposed, because not recognize such an important meaning, immediately rejected. As for the question: "Both the secular morality and the supernatural, why?" (opposite sex) agree agree concerning right speech, etc .. [58] he has done, or that he had been right at the time shown by the Holy Way.
"Is Sacred Path appear as soon as the secular ethics that end?" Opposite sect questioned. Agree agree Sakavadin involving two of "eschatological" temporary and comprehensive. Since seeing it as a violation, the opposite sex and asked, "What about the immoral, why?" etc .. But through confirming the views of the opposite sex, this only be explained as follows: a person who in the past has been the accumulation of merit and not a specific person are two kinds of ethics outlined on. Therefore the views of (sect opposed) was not justified.
Rate debate on two moral law ends here.
Because, because, when good behavior even if the conduct that has become stagnant, we have grown to be on the path of virtue. Because by virtue have done for so long, and it became obvious virtues. That is why some people, particularly those who belong to that sect advocated Mahansanghikas good character is auto that. Concerning those who rank Sakavadin questioned, and rival sects agree approval.
Article rest should be understood as has been explained in the debate on the Candidates points (Dana ), as is natural that there is not a (spiritual status quo) [60] . It confirmed this view, because it is not carefully implemented, should not be clearly demonstrated.
Rate debate automatic virtues that have ended here.
In the case of "not being conducted in accordance with the thought" only to be replaced by international "automatic thing that has."
Rate virtue debate is not conducted in accordance with such ideological ends here.
Due explained carelessly recorded paragraphs Blessed words starting with:
"Due to the cultivation of the park and jungle" [63]
In it we learn:
"The continuous development merit"
Some people, particularly those under sect advocated the merits Mahasanghikas development (only thanks to the good condition) is performed. Related to this person Sakavadin class to ask questions, related to the accumulation of virtue, regardless of the intellectual operation, rival sects agree approval.
Rate debate on the merits has not progressed in accordance with the precepts holding ends here.
Some people, particularly those under sect Sammitiyas Mahasanghikas and that "anticipates the body's physical behavior reminiscent voice is the voice behavior." [65] They claim that the first action such data is only normal behavior. Concerning those who rank Sakavadin ask: "Are these behaviors are foreseen only behavior ethical?" [128] Delegation of the opposition agreed to approve.
Because the moral (or ethical conduct) is only one act of abstinence, and not the physical characteristics, thus to try to motivate the opposite sex understood in that sense, in the interpretation: "Must Does abstinence is not to kill? " etc .. are raised: "Does the greeting is also a moral?" etc .. also mentioned the problem to prove, by giving such issues, anticipate the behavior is just a physical act alone, but for the opposite sex that it is a religious work virtue. But because the behavior is not a diet, therefore the question is raised: "Is this an abstaining not killing it?" This issue has been raised, but the opposite sect put his views a baseless. This is unconvincing.
Score acts debate the merits anticipate ends here.
Some people, particularly those who follow Mahasanghikas sect that advocates for the anticipated behavior (moral purpose) is the unethical behavior based on the idea that the accumulation of irregularities not connected both do with ideology, and based on facts: the unethical behavior like killing etc ... can be done by someone else's orders. Related to this person class, Sakavadin have questioned and rival sects agreed to approve.
"Is killing" etc .. are mentioned to try to convince (the opposite sex) on several actions xau.- "We will kill this person or that person." "We will get his property is that woman - whether the merits and mistakes have developed and reasonable?" - Delegation of the opposition rejected the related idea that, at the moment of implementation alms, that mistakes can not happen. When asked again (opposite sex) to agree to endorse because it involves the accumulation of violations unrelated to the latest ideas.
The remaining things here should be interpreted according to what has been explained in the debate on the merit points has been increased development along with the practicalities (good).
By presenting his views opposing sect just want to prove that unethical behavior has been determined as not the act is reminiscent of the ethical goals are unethical at all.
Rate debate on ethical behavior is not equivalent to anticipate unethical ends here.
By the end of this chapter also X.
Until this has been completed the second of fifty chapters.
-ooOoo-
Chapter XI
Means: (i) the meanest (ahetu) (unclear, ambiguous.) (Ii) neutral ( abyakata ). and (iii) not cittāsampayutta.
[129] For if it is said that "a normal person" is the moral sense and unethical to pursue, there are underlying trends, for the purpose and conditions of consciousness it is not right at all. So can not create the underlying trends. (to reveal themselves to be) in the sense of such a link can not be with any underlying trends. That is why some people, particularly those who belong to that sect Mahasanghikas and Sammitiyas: seven potential trends in the (seven) the specific morphology is just unethical behavior, no moral purpose and non- clear moral, and not depend on ideology. [67] in relation to these people, Sakavadin has repeatedly questioned the three lectures, and rival sects agreed to approve.
Because through interpretation outlined above we will be able to understand all that is left by complying with the suggested manner of Buddhist scriptures, and is not given the details.
Score three acts debate concerning trends humidity money ends here.
"Some people, like the followers of sects Mahasanghikas that a person, after removing ignorance with knowledge of religion [68] are experiencing the normal sense" is not associated with meditation, using the visual sense etc .. "can not simultaneously say that religion has been understanding," because at that time the path reflection has not been activated. Related to these people, Sakavadin questioned, and rival sects agree approval.
Then, through the interpretation that "When charity etc .. has been eliminated," to try to convince the opposite sect that if a person wants direct knowledge of the person has been removed can not "get wisdom religion, "then, someone whether sexual affinity etc .. have been removed can not be removed by the charity education etc .. (because)" You do not lack the ability to determine the kind of person! " opposite sect rejected, etc .. for those who have used the same with sexual love. etc ..
In conclusion, as we have reason to say that "the opposite sex get wisdom" of someone that has reached Tue, therefore Sakavadin denied: "not like that"
Rate meditation debate end here.
[130] So when the Arhat has recognized her gain knowledge related to what he has achieved Sacred Way, he can experience the sense of sight. etc. meditation not adapt it, that's why some people, particularly those belonging to sects that advocated meditation Pubbaseliya incompatible with the ideology. [69] In relation to these people Sakavadin questioned, even opposite sects agree approval.
Then, "As for the star material" etc .. as questions are raised to try to persuade rival sects that if divorced from the ideological understanding, the knowledge must be consistent with the material etc .. is finished different than ideology. Opposite sect denies this.
It is understood in the rest of the explanation given above.
In conclusion, when (the opposite sex) was asked: "(Are the heterogeneous IP) with wisdom?"[70] Delegation of the opposition agreed to endorse because rival sects accept that when someone claiming Tue because he had reached what he had reached it.
Rate Tue debate is not affiliated with a sense end here.
Some people, particularly those who follow Andhakas sect holds that a practitioner [71](yogavacara), within moments of entering Noble, uttered the sentence: "This is the Noble Truth!"Insight into the First Noble Truth emerges nature activities. [72] It is relevant to this category was Sakavadin questioned. Rival sects agree approval concerning both the statement and the person from which such knowledge unfold. But precisely because (opposite sex) is approved for a normal person is also exposed to words related to the three legs to rest, but no results occur after the speech there. Therefore the question of whether such incidents may happen next later? "Etc .. rival sects rejected.
"Is it physical forms of impermanent form reasonable?" etc .. the question raised by the progress demonstrated to show "First Noble Truth" But the opposite sect rejected because (opposite sex) do not realize is how to say it in his own doctrine. [ 73]
"And affordable you mean that this ..." etc .. raised a question to prove the opposite sex know that if meditation comes from the First Noble Truth, they must be linked to the four types of knowledge continue to come from each word in the form: "This is the First Noble Truth?" But the opposite sect rejected because (opposing sects) do not want to (be considered) as such.
Rate debate on the statement "This is hard to!" finish here.
[131] Some people, namely those who follow Mahasanghikas sect, because not understood "real benefits to practicing the steps leading to kabbalah, to advocate the view that" any particular person psychic power. Can live a lifetime of enjoyment Earth [75] (on this earth), "Concerning the Sakavadin class people raised the question:" Does a person can live kabbalah lifelong enjoyment or he?"
In this case there is a period of time (lifetime) is composed of three categories: (1) In human life, (2) a process component (human life), and (3) the existence of the earth. In verse paraphrase: "O monk Chu has four impossible to foresee in a lifetime [76] (process - kappa). It was a full human life. In the interpretation," A process of gods Thien, Brahma lasts throughout their lives. "[77] which is part of the process (human life) of this. in the interpretation," he or she must undergo suffering in hell in a process of life (lifetime), in another life that person to be happy in heaven, " here is understood as the maximum age. it would like to say here is, life can be at maximum longevity may end end or as a result of karma or by the years passed. Sakavadin questioned about these issues, related to a "eons" and seconded opposition agreed in agreement. Then Sakavadin set questions with the opposite sex: "are lifespan characteristics is a psychic or not?" etc .. to try to convince the opposite sex, if such a person has been kabbalah, that person may experience a great life or a part of that life, the longer the time period the normal human life (as alluded to in the following passage from the Buddha: " He lives in a long time , lasted more than a hundred years. " [78] and so the life of that person must be considered a magic (miracles). Because only know vital function is nothing more than the result should karma opposite sect rejected for the vital functions identified by the divine power.
"But here's what has to discern where a person has psychic powers? Is not it that the assignment is even those who do not have psychic powers can live fully is both a human life?" A person with this power, may rely on it, for a period of life, to avoid the things that can lead to premature death.A person does not have this power, this can not be avoided. This is what the difference between these classes of people.
"Is it only in the past or in the future again?" Questions are raised to try to persuade the opposing sect to accept that people can live there any how in the process (life) there. "Neither of the two processes are not?" etc .. that is the question to be raised to try to convince, if a person has psychic powers can survive until the end of his life, he or she may do so, not only in a process (lifetime) that the lives of many others. "The relationship emerged like?" etc .. is mentioned to show that can not achieve all the [132] by the magic of this place, there are many things not included in this psychic realm.
It was too obvious remaining.
Rate kabbalah debate ends here.
For reasons of Buddha has said: - "After seven days and seven nights estate, without a word, immersed in absolute bliss." [79] . Some people, particularly those who follow Mahayana sect Sabbatthivadins and (Uttarapathakas) advocated that the samadhi [80] constantly stretching may constitute concentration (specified). They did not enter the mean concentration of thought. [81] In relation to these people raises questions and Sakavadin rival sects agree approval.
Then to try to convince the opposite sex as follows: "If the sense of continuity is called Mental Tuc, they need including the current state of consciousness in the past and the future. And the only state of consciousness current can not be formed Additional Mental. are all these things also constitute samadhi? "-" this may include past reasonable? " etc .. Delegation opposed dismissed, because (the opposite sex) do not like that.
To prove in focusing enter continuous meditation which only the current status quo can be operated alone, and not to mention the past has passed and the future has not happened; How can we call it a mental-sufficient? - "Is not the past have passed?" placed into question.
Affordable entry is restricted to one point in the consciousness for a short time or not? "The opposite sect questioned, agreed to endorse Sakavadin as related to the statement of the doctrine of the Buddha, namely, "Do you, O monks, cultivate sufficient mental. " etc .. based on the sufficient mental conditioning meant tirelessly pursued calculation associated with the current state of good sense " Regarding the realistic opportunity visual sense, why? "etc .. is placed into question through the grounds of the phrase" one minute consciousness for a moment. "Sakavadin denied this right on diagrams.
In the interpretive question - "Did not Buddha did not say?" etc .. what proved to be no interruption in the current concentration, through past and future. That is not the current state of constant concentration or what? That is why this point has not come to a conclusion.
Rate enter the debate ends here.
VII . Rate Debate: Concentration where everything started. France is anticipated (dhamatthitata ). [82]
For it is the Buddha said: " There exists a proposition about things, and it is taken as a basis" [83]; [133] Some people, particularly those who belong to the sect advocated Andhakas that each term in a causal chain is fundamental perspective is one consideration, and thus has become predestined. related to these people have questioned Sakavadin and opposing sects rejected.
And then to try to convince the opposite sex, that if ignorance [84] and things like that have been predestined by another cause, in turn, another reason also determined [85] This causes .. . and on and on like that. etc .. - Is there a reason that has been predetermined? "etc .. as questions are raised. seconded opposition rejected, because there is no public policy perspective so at all. When asked again , (opposite sex) to agree to agree, because (the opposite sex) judgment that the correlation exists continuously and over again [86] between the parties.
What remained was too well according to what has been explained above.
Rate postulate debate where everything ends here.
Some people, particularly those under sect Andhakas impermanence advocated that the money equally rather than the impermanence of all things where the body such as, etc .. [87] In relation to these people Sakavadin questioned. and opposing sects agree approval.
Then to try to convince the opposite sex: if the impermanence of all things impermanent to be predestined. like body, etc .. this will create beings also called the impermanence other. Also similar to the money to do so. "Are impermanence also predestined or what?" etc .. are raised into question. Initially opposed sects rejected as both an expression of impermanence where it does not happen all at once, and then (the opposite sex) to agree to agree, because impermanence can not become permanent is and will disappear with it own impermanence.
Then to prove the opposite sex found that by accepting a second embodiment of impermanence (opposite sex) will be drawn into a series of endless impermanence plan. everything had been predestined in a specific way. No prospects come to an end in predestination. Not wanting to create literacy opposition a chance to evade, Sakavadin ask: affordable things are so all-star? "Etc ..
In the question: "Does the old properties have been predestined?" etc .. because no one else is impermanent plan where the melting washing. and death appears, therefore: the impermanence are seen as relevant to the analysis. On this point too the rival sects agree and reject approval must be understood by the method mentioned above.
"Does the body have been predestined?" etc .. referred the question [134] to compare with anything is characteristic of impermanence. After rival sects have judged that the body etc .. was predestined to be ephemeral in nature and can not be left to such characteristics. Should the opposite sex completely rejected.END=NAM MO AMITABHA BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH GIAC TAM.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTENMENT.VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN AMITABHA PURELAND=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.1/12/2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment